Attachment to Independent Case Review Report For CDRU # 812 Case file # 95~HO-288871.

Material Examiner Malone (RQ)

Remarks:

CRM - 2895

INDEPENDENT CASE REVIEW REPORT

Independent Review conducted by:__ Seven Kopescrsed

Area(s) of Expertise: Hf Qik. Awd Fiber Review commenced at: _& :SOA (Time), 7114 199 Date)

Filet: GS 2¥997/

Laboratory #65); _ GO 77 Z022—

Examiner(s) & Symbols

Reviewed Not Reviewed Reviewed Not Reviewed RO o a o a 0 0 ° o

a a G a

Materials Reviewed Trial testimony transcript{s) of: Testimony Date(s); Pages: Laboratory Report(s):

Laboratory Number:___ 7070 30.2. 2 Date:_ er s2.,198F

Laboratory Number: Date:

Laboratory Number: Date: Examiner Bench Notes of: RQ Avr unicwws Tectwiaas Laboratory Number:_ 4070302 2 Laboratory Number. Laboratory Number: Page soe of, Be

Initials: Be

CRM - 2896

Was any other material reviewed? Yes a No

Ifyes, please identify and/or describe the material: _SQUBMITHG AGewcy LETTER NATED Tune 27 19iP

Results of Review

File #: IS-2EG6 af Item or Specimen # Reviewed: @ - OY ke)

Review of Laboratory Report(s) and Bench Notes:

Note: Numbered comments are required below or on additional pages for any “No” or “Unable to Determine” Responses

1) Did the examiner perform the appropriate tests in a scientifically acceptable manner, based on the methods, protocols, and analytic techniques available at the time of the original examination(s)? OYes OGNo Unable to Determine

2) Are the examination results set forth in the laboratory repor{{s) supported and adequately documented in the ‘bench notes? 9 Yes No @ Unable to Determine

Review of Testimony:

Note: Numbered comments are required below or on additional pages for any “No” or “Unable to Determine” Responses

Lt ‘ranscript not available.

3) Testimony consistent with the laboratory report(s)? BYes No OUnable to Determine

4) Testimony consistent with the bench notes? O Yes ONo = O Unable to Determine

5) Testimony within bounds of examiner's expertise? aYes ONo O Unable to Determine Page__ Zo. 3

Initials ea

Pe

G 20882

Comments (Set forth by above question #, if applicable. a uu Use “Additional Comments” Sheet, if needed) e QtumedTATZIO [S mWSUFFICienwT Tb ExMiVE (Ff _Lt

TESTS WELE PERK OLMED (fe SCi@tIRieh ley ACCEPTBELE AUER, 2a, Tue Resucrs ARC makemihery pocuminten wt tue vates, [ike Mores Air Wor DATED, ARE ts) PEWUE fal) ALE WOT sabitigited Ay Tite TecHcipe, The _yumber oF HAR AVALBELE AnD GAAMWED 18 er ADT OU ATELY DélumenTe, Tite: TecuaiciAd Deeks eT Pdcumen7 The LECURY Ad MbUNnwG OF ANY Hak WR FISEDS FRim Fie Ceoritius , Trae ARE fp FEUS CRABURES IN THE NOTES,

A Can FIRMATION OF THe HAIR COMPARISON WAS APPARENTLY

ORTHNED Peon AnoTHEe Exam, BUT Tie . CONFIRMATIAN SHEET

OES wor SPEaIFY WHAT 3

Review completed at: G .20A (Time) , G 1 ZF Mate)

h Total time spent conducting review (to nearest 1/4 hour): Ye hour

Thereby certify that I conducted this review in an independent, unbiased manner and that the results of my review are fully documented on this report consisting of @ total of. Pages,

Flt: 99

- (Signature) (Date)

Page 3 of, 3

Initials _fite